Country Land and Business Association

You are here : Policy Work » Game Shoot Standards

Shooting

Shooting

The CLA is representing members' views and interests on the Lead Ammunition Group, CLA  Director General Adrian Gane met with those from other organisations in late April to discuss the objectives of the group. (Posted 18 May 2010)

CLA Policy on Shooting

Almost all our members either shoot or allow shooting over their land, for pest control or for sport. Shooting provides considerable economic, social and environmental benefits. It is important that any controls are balanced against these. The CLA calls on government to:

  • recognise that the legal use of firearms for sports and land management is not the problem - that is confined to their illegal use in crime;
  • remove disproportionate restrictions on the consumption of game meat; and 
  • ensure that the Code for Game Rearing does not go beyond what is required for best practice.

Code of Practice for Gamebird Welfare

The CLA is delighted  that the  Defra Code of Practice for the Welfare of Gamebirds Reared for Sporting Purposes was withdrawn before it become legally binding.  We lobbied the Opposition before the Coalition Government was formed and afterwards on this issue.

The industry is happy to have a code to protect welfare, and one had been agreed which codified best practice. However, several last-minute additions had been made which had not been discussed with the Defra Gamebird Working Group, on which the CLA served. Defra Minister Jim Paice has now reconvened the working group and we look forward to working on it for a sensible code which reflects members' interests. (Posted 27 May 2010)

Lead Ammunition Group

This has been set up by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).  Its aim is to advise Defra and the Food Standards Authority (FSA) on the key threats to wildlife from lead ammunition and to consider how, if there are significant threats, they might be solved. It is also considering whether there is a risk to human health through the use of lead shot and, if so, what should be done about it. The CLA's view is that the precautionary principle alone is not enough to justify a ban - peer-reviewed research showing harm would be necessary.

Members may be interested in the summary of research on this topic submitted by Efra.

Background

Lead shot is already banned in wildfowl grounds because of the risk of lead poisoning of water birds - they may eat spent pellets. The effect on the population of  birds is unknown.  In game birds there is a much lower prevalence of lead pellets found in their digestive systems - research suggests less than five percent, and they seem to pass through their systems relatively quickly. The group will be looking carefully at research on whether or not lead shot in the environment may cause a decline in raptor numbers.

There are a number of areas of concern. Alternatives to lead shot which can be used in classic British shotguns are much more expensive and an outright ban on lead shot - not presently envisaged - could have an impact on those attempting to control pests on their land, for example.Those who stalk deer point out that lead shot is a more humane way to kill than the alternatives.  Steel shot cannot be safely used in commercial woodlands: it can damage chainsaws when timber is felled.

 Views and experience in the USA are mixed. Arizona, for example, has worked closely with hunters and seen condor numbers rise.

The value of shooting - economic:

  • The value of shooting to the UK economy is £1.6 billion,
  • Shooting supports the equivalent of almost 70,000 full-time jobs,
  • Shooters spend £2billion each year on goods and services. 

The value of shooting - environmental:

  • Two million hectares are managed for conservation because of shooting,
  • Shoot providers spend £250 million a year on conservation,
  • Shooters spend 2.7 million work days on conservation - the equivalent of 12,000 full-time jobs.

Contrary to its image as an activity only for the privileged, most of the shooting available in the UK is pest control - pigeon and rabbit shooting. This protects crops.

Conservation for managed shoots includes planting trees and hedges to provide better habitat. In 2004, for example, shooters spent £8m on trees. Higher densities of butterflies are found on land managed for shoots. Rats, mink and crows are commonly shot as pests, allowing greater biodiversity. Of pheasants and partridges, 99 percent are eaten. Such birds are the ultimate in healthy, low fat, free-range food.

Figures are taken from Shooting Sports a peer-reviewed report by the independent Public & Corporate Economic Consultants, co-sponsored by the CLA.


Member LoginCLA Member Login





Remember me

Policy Contact


Oliver Harwood FRICS
Chief Surveyor

Responsible for national land use policy issues, and lead author of the draft renewable energy policy. Also provides advice to members on land use issues, including farming, alternative enterprise, minerals, shooting and wayleaves and easements.

T: 020 7460 7940
F: 020 7235 4696
oliver.harwood@cla.org.uk

Media Contacts


Ollie Wilson
Director of Communications

T: 020 7460 7936
F: 020 7460 7962
ollie.wilson@cla.org.uk


Lisa Barker

National Press Officer

T: 020 7460 7934
M: 07876 023 792
lisa.barker@cla.org.uk

Join the CLA today


Join the CLAAnyone who owns rural land or runs a rural business will benefit from joining the CLA.


Click here to find out how

The CLA Game Fair 2010


Ragley Hall, Warwickshire was enjoyed by 144,000 visitors over the 3 days.

Click here for competition and championship results; listen to the debates that took place and to visit the virtual Game Fair.


© 2010 Country Land and Business Association Limited (CLA). All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as expressly permitted by law.

Disclaimer

No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the material included in or omitted in this website can be or is accepted by the author(s), the CLA or its officers or trustees or employees or any other persons.

The Advisory Services are made available to members on the basis that members' rights to compensation and the liability (if any) of CLA and its officers and/or its staff advisers, are restricted in the following ways. In the event of any advice given by any CLA staff adviser being given negligently or otherwise being incorrect no liability whatsoever is accepted by the CLA or its officers or by its staff advisers concerned

(a) towards any person who is not the current CLA member to whom the advice was directly given,

(b) to any person in the respect of consequential loss or loss of profits, or

(c) to any person for any sum exceeding £50,000 in respect of any one enquiry (whether made or responded to orally or in writing and whether dealt with at one time or over a period of time).

Any person making use of the Advisory Services accepts such restrictions. Members should refer to appropriate professional advisers in private practice before taking any particular course of action potentially or actually involving any substantial amounts of money.

Please note that whilst the advisers are able to advise on a wide range of subjects relating to land ownership, they cannot act in place of a member's own solicitor, accountant, surveyor and tax specialist by, for example, drafting documents or corresponding on their behalf and may be precluded, by the rules of their own professions, from advising one CLA member against another CLA member in the case of conflict.

Solicitors Indemnity Fund . Solicitors in the CLA Legal Team are not covered by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund in relation to professional negligence in relation to any advice given by them.

Please note that from time to time telephone calls maybe recorded for training purposes.