You are here : News and Press » News Archive » Legal » Equine
CLA wins vital victory for common sense over horse liability The CLA today scored a major campaigning victory as the Government published a consultation paper proposing reforms to the Animals Act 1971 for which the Association has been lobbying for five years. Although a change in the law would affect various animals including cattle, in practice, liability cases have overwhelmingly involved horses.
CLA President Henry Aubrey-Fletcher said: "This is great news for horse owners and a great campaigning success for the CLA. The CLA is only organisation that has consistently lobbied on this issue to protect animal owners.
"The proposal would end the unfairness that meant an owner could be held liable for their horse's behaviour even when they had done everything reasonably possible to prevent an accident."
The CLA President added: "Hopefully, now the risks of having to pay out have been reduced, the insurance companies will cut the premiums animal owners have been burdened with in recent years.
"Of course a person who is negligent in the way they control their animal should be held liable if that animal injures someone, but it is wrong for someone to be held liable if they had no reason to suspect that there would be a problem and, in any event, had done everything they could to prevent it."
The current state of the law is the result of a judgment of the House of Lords in 2003 in the case of Mirvahedy v Henley*.
Their lordships ruled that "strict liability" applied to all animal owners, which meant that the owner of what appeared to be perfectly normal animal could be held liable for any injuries it caused.
This was regardless of how careful that owner had been and regardless of any steps he had taken to prevent the damage.
As well as being fundamentally unfair, this meant that owners of animals could face huge compensation claims, which contributed to a massive increase in insurance premiums.
The CLA previously came close to amending the law working with Stephen Crabb MP on a Private Member's Bill.
*In Mirvahedy v Henley, Mr Mirvahedy was seriously injured when his car was in collision with a horse owned by Mr and Mrs Henley which had been spooked by something unknown and bolted onto a dual carriageway. The horse had been in a secure field and a claim against the Henleys under liability in negligence failed. However, in a majority judgment in the House of Lords, the Henleys were held strictly liable for the horse's actions, and thus for Mr Mirvahedy's injuries, under section 2(2)(b) of the Animals Act 1971.
CLA MEDIA CONTACTS:
For further information and interviews:
Phillippa Coates, Press Officer, 020 7460 7934, phillippa.coates@cla.org.uk
Oliver Wilson, Director of Communications, 020 7460 7936 or 07702 928828, ollie.wilson@cla.org.uk,
Out of hours: 020 7201 9511.
|
Contact Christopher Price
Media Contacts Ollie Wilson T: 020 7460 7936
T: 020 7460 7934
Join the CLA today
More articles and documents [News Archive] [7 March 2008] GN13-12 Dealing with Uninvited Horses [Guidance notes] [9 May 2012] |
© 2012 Country Land and Business Association Limited (CLA). All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as expressly permitted by law.
Disclaimer
No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the material included in or omitted in this website can be or is accepted by the author(s), the CLA or its officers or trustees or employees or any other persons.
The Advisory Services are made available to members on the basis that members' rights to compensation and the liability (if any) of CLA and its officers and/or its staff advisers, are restricted in the following ways. In the event of any advice given by any CLA staff adviser being given negligently or otherwise being incorrect no liability whatsoever is accepted by the CLA or its officers or by its staff advisers concerned
(a) towards any person who is not the current CLA member to whom the advice was directly given,
(b) to any person in the respect of consequential loss or loss of profits, or
(c) to any person for any sum exceeding £50,000 in respect of any one enquiry (whether made or responded to orally or in writing and whether dealt with at one time or over a period of time).
Any person making use of the Advisory Services accepts such restrictions. Members should refer to appropriate professional advisers in private practice before taking any particular course of action potentially or actually involving any substantial amounts of money.
Please note that whilst the advisers are able to advise on a wide range of subjects relating to land ownership, they cannot act in place of a member's own solicitor, accountant, surveyor and tax specialist by, for example, drafting documents or corresponding on their behalf and may be precluded, by the rules of their own professions, from advising one CLA member against another CLA member in the case of conflict.
Solicitors Indemnity Fund . Solicitors in the CLA Legal Team are not covered by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund in relation to professional negligence in relation to any advice given by them.
Please note that from time to time telephone calls maybe recorded for training purposes.