You are here : News and Press » News Archive » Government » Animal Disease
Parliamentarians demand compensation for pigswill processors Senior politicians last night called on the Government to compensate swill processors whose industry they shut down during foot and mouth disease (FMD) in 2001. At an event organised by the Country Land & Business Association (CLA) in Parliament yesterday (3 March), Labour MP George Howarth and Conservative MP Boris Johnson launched an Early Day Motion demanding compensation for the 62 members of the Association of Swill Users (ASU).
The £40 million swill processing industry was closed down after it was alleged FMD spread from swill used on a single pig farm in Heddon-on-the-Wall owned by the Waugh brothers. Bobby Waugh did not process waste himself, he was only licensed to feed swill to pigs and no evidence of FMD was found at any other farms processing swill. The Government vet who carried out the last inspection of that farm before FMD broke out, has since admitted that he should have been more rigorous, and that the Waugh's practices were, "patently deficient". Now the food waste that processors once handled (1.7 million tones per year) goes to landfill sites. Speaking at the event George Howarth MP said, "We want the Government to accept that they have taken away people's livelihoods as a result of Defra's failure to supervise one farm." Boris Johnson MP commented that "The whole of a British industry was destroyed at the stroke of a bureaucrat's pen". David Fursdon, CLA Deputy President who chaired the event said, "This was a heavily regulated industry and no swill processor was actually prosecuted in relation to the outbreak of FMD, so why haven't they received compensation like other groups whose businesses were banned by governments - for example mink farmers?" Jason Podmore, who was bankrupted by the ban, spoke of the dramatic change to his circumstances: "I went from making a good living to receiving a letter stating that we had ten days to pack up swill processing." Keith Ineson, an agricultural chaplain who counsels ex-swill users, some of whom are suffering with severe depression, commented, "Compensation would give them back their dignity and help remove the stigma of blame from swill processors who were carrying out their jobs legally and correctly." 4 March 2005 |
Contact Christopher Price
Media Contacts Ollie Wilson T: 020 7460 7936
T: 020 7460 7934
Join the CLA today
More articles and documents [News Archive] [27 January 2010] GN01-06-Requirements under the Poultry Register [Guidance notes] [16 February 2006] Draft Commission Regulation of on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid to small and medium sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) 70/2001 [Consultation response archive] [21 September 2006] |
© 2012 Country Land and Business Association Limited (CLA). All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as expressly permitted by law.
Disclaimer
No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the material included in or omitted in this website can be or is accepted by the author(s), the CLA or its officers or trustees or employees or any other persons.
The Advisory Services are made available to members on the basis that members' rights to compensation and the liability (if any) of CLA and its officers and/or its staff advisers, are restricted in the following ways. In the event of any advice given by any CLA staff adviser being given negligently or otherwise being incorrect no liability whatsoever is accepted by the CLA or its officers or by its staff advisers concerned
(a) towards any person who is not the current CLA member to whom the advice was directly given,
(b) to any person in the respect of consequential loss or loss of profits, or
(c) to any person for any sum exceeding £50,000 in respect of any one enquiry (whether made or responded to orally or in writing and whether dealt with at one time or over a period of time).
Any person making use of the Advisory Services accepts such restrictions. Members should refer to appropriate professional advisers in private practice before taking any particular course of action potentially or actually involving any substantial amounts of money.
Please note that whilst the advisers are able to advise on a wide range of subjects relating to land ownership, they cannot act in place of a member's own solicitor, accountant, surveyor and tax specialist by, for example, drafting documents or corresponding on their behalf and may be precluded, by the rules of their own professions, from advising one CLA member against another CLA member in the case of conflict.
Solicitors Indemnity Fund . Solicitors in the CLA Legal Team are not covered by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund in relation to professional negligence in relation to any advice given by them.
Please note that from time to time telephone calls maybe recorded for training purposes.