You are here : News and Press » News Archive » Countryside Sports » Crime
CLA in the news: CLA president debates game Acts Reform In a discussion about the Government's intention to reform of the Game Acts, CLA President Mark Hudson, and the Minister for Nature Conservation and Fisheries Ben Bradshaw agreed on the need to protect landowners from poaching.
Speaking on Radio 4's PM programme (12 Oct), Mark Hudson said, 'The important thing to remember is that the principle function of the Game Acts is to prevent poaching. We in the CLA accept that the wording is antiquated and it needs to be made relevant for modern conditions but the need to have laws to prevent poaching remains.'The Game Acts also have a conservation value in that they impose closed seasons in respect to certain species and those too should be retained. But, in fact, both these can be achieved by an amendment to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. There are aspects of the Game Acts which we would say should be abolished and, in particular, the need to hold a licence to shoot game and the prohibition on selling game meat the whole year round. We think these are thoroughly outdated.' However, Mr Hudson stressed the need to consider what would replace the Acts: 'The current Game Acts are the only way that a landowner can try to prevent poaching. If this was got rid of wholesale that would leave a problem for landowners.' In response, the Minster commented, 'I agree with what Mark had to say. The law is archaic, it needs modernising. We want to cut red tape and we want to ensure a plentiful supply of game all year round...I also agree with him that we need to keep the closed seasons, which are valuable, and we need to ensure that we don't do anything that allows poaching, which has been declining in recent years, to increase.' In response to a question on how the Government would deter poaching, Mr Bradshaw said 'There are already laws, armed trespass, trespass and theft, that could be used to control poaching but if Mark has concerns about the way we go around reforming the Game licensing and the impact that it might have on poaching then I'm happy to discuss them with him because that is the last thing that we want to do.' Mr Bradshaw also discussed the healthy qualities of game meat and his desire to see the demand and supply for it increase. In conclusion, Mr Hudson noted, 'Clearly, we are talking along the same lines and I look forward to discussing the detail with the Minister as soon as possible.' 13 October 2004 |
Contact Christopher Price
Media Contacts Ollie Wilson T: 020 7460 7936
T: 020 7460 7934
Join the CLA today
More articles and documents [News Archive] [29 November 2011] GN14-05 Hunting Act 2004 - Landowner’s Consent and other FAQs [Guidance notes] [30 September 2005] Review of the general licences to kill or take certain species of birds under section 16 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 [Consultation response archive] [19 August 2004] |
© 2012 Country Land and Business Association Limited (CLA). All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as expressly permitted by law.
Disclaimer
No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the material included in or omitted in this website can be or is accepted by the author(s), the CLA or its officers or trustees or employees or any other persons.
The Advisory Services are made available to members on the basis that members' rights to compensation and the liability (if any) of CLA and its officers and/or its staff advisers, are restricted in the following ways. In the event of any advice given by any CLA staff adviser being given negligently or otherwise being incorrect no liability whatsoever is accepted by the CLA or its officers or by its staff advisers concerned
(a) towards any person who is not the current CLA member to whom the advice was directly given,
(b) to any person in the respect of consequential loss or loss of profits, or
(c) to any person for any sum exceeding £50,000 in respect of any one enquiry (whether made or responded to orally or in writing and whether dealt with at one time or over a period of time).
Any person making use of the Advisory Services accepts such restrictions. Members should refer to appropriate professional advisers in private practice before taking any particular course of action potentially or actually involving any substantial amounts of money.
Please note that whilst the advisers are able to advise on a wide range of subjects relating to land ownership, they cannot act in place of a member's own solicitor, accountant, surveyor and tax specialist by, for example, drafting documents or corresponding on their behalf and may be precluded, by the rules of their own professions, from advising one CLA member against another CLA member in the case of conflict.
Solicitors Indemnity Fund . Solicitors in the CLA Legal Team are not covered by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund in relation to professional negligence in relation to any advice given by them.
Please note that from time to time telephone calls maybe recorded for training purposes.