You are here : News and Press » News Archive » Access to the Countryside » Rights of Way
CLA and NFU say Government must keep bargain on end of old rights of way claims The CLA and NFU today (Thursday, 25 March) said they were "relieved" that Natural England has accepted the recommendations of the Stakeholder Working Group on Unrecorded Rights of Way. But both organisations stressed it is vital that the Government keeps its side of the bargain with the 2026 cut-off date for recording historic rights of way.
They said that currently farmers and land mangers can find themselves facing a claim that there is a public right of access across their land based purely on evidence dating back centuries.
CLA President William Worsley said: "The situation over the Discovering Lost Ways project is ridiculous. We are very pleased the end is in sight, even though it may still be some way off. "People's homes or businesses could be damaged by erroneous claims that, because the public had a right to cross that stretch of land in ancient times, they still do, even if that right has not been exercised for decades or even centuries." He added: "The CROW Act, passed in 2000, contains the 2026 cut-off date, so Natural England's acceptance of the Stakeholder Working Group's recommendations is no more than a backing of Parliament's will that an end to uncertainty on this issue is necessary."
NFU President Peter Kendall said: "For NFU members this package of proposals for reform would mean an end to claims coming 'out of the blue' which are based on historical evidence and have no place in a modern farming business.
"Any opportunity to avoid conflicts between Rights of Way and current land use will mean farmers and growers are able to focus on the primary task at hand; namely producing food and managing their land. It could also see an end to the current situation where applications for Rights of Way, which are supported by poor evidence, can end up blighting a property for many years." Natural England's Stepping Forward report recommends that unless historic rights are officially recorded by 2026, they should disappear for ever. After 2026, it will no longer be possible for anyone to claim, on purely historic grounds, that a right of way crosses someone's land. However, this recommendation can only be implemented if all the other recommendations in the report are also acted on. The CLA and the NFU have called on the Government to make clear how it intends to implement the recommendations as a matter of urgency. |
Contact Christopher Price
Media Contacts Ollie Wilson T: 020 7460 7936
T: 020 7460 7934
Join the CLA today
More articles and documents [News Archive] [23 February 2012] Coastal Access (England only)- Background and Government Response to DEFRA Consultation and Pre-legislative Scrutiny of Part 9 Draft Marine Bill [Guidance notes] [7 October 2008] Natural England Consultation on the activiation and expiry of fire prevention restrictions under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act (CRoW) 2000 [Consultation response archive] [1 October 2007] |
© 2012 Country Land and Business Association Limited (CLA). All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as expressly permitted by law.
Disclaimer
No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the material included in or omitted in this website can be or is accepted by the author(s), the CLA or its officers or trustees or employees or any other persons.
The Advisory Services are made available to members on the basis that members' rights to compensation and the liability (if any) of CLA and its officers and/or its staff advisers, are restricted in the following ways. In the event of any advice given by any CLA staff adviser being given negligently or otherwise being incorrect no liability whatsoever is accepted by the CLA or its officers or by its staff advisers concerned
(a) towards any person who is not the current CLA member to whom the advice was directly given,
(b) to any person in the respect of consequential loss or loss of profits, or
(c) to any person for any sum exceeding £50,000 in respect of any one enquiry (whether made or responded to orally or in writing and whether dealt with at one time or over a period of time).
Any person making use of the Advisory Services accepts such restrictions. Members should refer to appropriate professional advisers in private practice before taking any particular course of action potentially or actually involving any substantial amounts of money.
Please note that whilst the advisers are able to advise on a wide range of subjects relating to land ownership, they cannot act in place of a member's own solicitor, accountant, surveyor and tax specialist by, for example, drafting documents or corresponding on their behalf and may be precluded, by the rules of their own professions, from advising one CLA member against another CLA member in the case of conflict.
Solicitors Indemnity Fund . Solicitors in the CLA Legal Team are not covered by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund in relation to professional negligence in relation to any advice given by them.
Please note that from time to time telephone calls maybe recorded for training purposes.